Thursday, May 25, 2017

Bayer CropScience meets Research Triangle High School


I will preface this entry with the fact that I work at Bayer CropScience but as this is a personal blog, these are my own viewpoints and perspectives.  
I have come to learn that one thing I always look forward to these days is when I get a chance to work with our younger generation on scientific outreach.  I do outreach to help people understand what Bayer does.  I also do outreach because it is an opportunity for people to understand who we are at a personal level and for me to understand their personal ideologies.   I and my colleagues work at a big company, but we are people just like anyone else.  When people get to know us and we get to know others, the conversation becomes much more interesting and productive. 

 Many times this outreach is showing elementary kids how to isolate DNA from bananas or letting middle schoolers participate in a pH experiment.   We use fun experiments like making slime to explain to kids the science behind that fun.  However when you start working with high school students you can go beyond the simple experiments.  Not only can you go deeper into the science but you also realize there is a lot they can teach you.
We have so many people committed to outreach and doing such great things to engage our community.   This is just one example to share a great experience we had at work with some very gifted high school students.   The team I work with at Bayer is called the Plant Genome Engineering Group.  This is just a fancy way of saying we are the group that makes transgenic (GMO) soybean plants.   We wanted to do an outreach activity together were we share who we are as scientists and engage some students to understand our industry and what we do.  Most importantly we wanted the conversation to come down to a personal level.

We invited 29 students from Research Triangle High School, a local high school here in central North Carolina to come to our site located in Morrisville, NC.  Our goal was to:

1.)    Let the student’s network with scientists and get to know us on a more personal level. 

2.)    Learn more about the students and who they are.  What are their concerns and their ambitions?

3.)    Teach the students about our industry and what it means to take a product from start to finish.


We have some awesome folks in Bayer, one of whom is named Dean.  He and a team had already established a very in depth case study called NXGen AG.  The case study involves a team of students choosing a GMO product concept and making all the choices needed to get that product to the finish line.  These choices include a product concept, how many field trials, how to source protein production, how to handle seed production , what market share to target, and what type of market growth to target.  These were just a few of the decisions the groups need to make.  Each group of students worked with a couple of scientists to understand what these choices are and then decide on how to proceed. 
 
 
 

 
Watching the scientists and students interact over half a day was a joy.  Both groups were engaged and asking each other questions.     The room was full of chatter:  Why does the protein that kills the pests not hurt humans?  Or maybe it was the scientist asking, where are you going to college and what do you want do when you graduate? 
 
 

 

At the end of the case study each group was able to present their  product concept.  Here they were:

 
“NWW-492”

A soybean plant with enhanced water efficiency to grow better in drought conditions.

 


“Shut-Up” 

A soybean with increased yield.

 


“FortiSoy”

Soybean that is resistant to pests such as catepillars.


 

“Gen Shield”

Soybean that is resistant to pests such as caterpillars.

 


“DripDrip”

A soybean plant with enhanced water efficiency to grow better in drought conditions.

 

 

At the end of the day, each team presented their concept, why they would market this product and what they learned.   I feel that this case study does help put into perspective the decisions we need to make as well as the time and effort that goes into a product.  It also shows that when dealing with Biology, nothing is a given.  For instance a field trial that is hit by a flood can put your product back one year. 

It was a joy to work with the school and students and I look forward to the next interaction with our community.  Even more inspiring is getting the notes from the school and students.

From the school and students:


·         We wanted to send our thanks to you and the team at Bayer for the wonderful experience you hosted for our students last week. One of the parents told me that the kids didn't stop talking about the trip the entire drive back to school, and I heard really positive feedback from all of my students.  

·         Thank you so much for spending your day with us! It was really interesting to tour the labs and especially to do the case study.  I really appreciated your talking through each possible scenario at each of the different steps so we completely understood what could and did happen throughout the process.  I was also really thankful for the time you took to answer our questions, no matter how complicated they were.  It always felt like you were speaking to the group as though we were your equals, and that meant a lot. Thank you again for taking the time out of your day to work with us, and I hope you have a lovely day!

·         Thank you for the wonderful experience you provided for my group during our school’s tour to Bayer.   It was really insightful from our conversations to see exactly what stance GM specialists have on GM critics. It was mind blowing to learn just how many safety tests are required in order for a GM product to reach the market. Also, thank you for walking us through and letting us experiment with the case study. It was really interesting seeing how you always tied things that we did within the case study to real examples you have encountered at work. 

·         Thank you for allowing us to come in and work with you guys!  The trip was very informational, interesting, and intuitive.  I enjoyed working with you guys and the activity was structured very well. I think you guys did a fantastic job explaining things as well as allowing our group to think for ourselves and make our own decisions.  I appreciate the work you do at Bayer and hope that this partnership with my school continues for future classes to see and experience what I did.  

·         This trip opened my eyes to the positive side of GM technology and benefits that can arise from it.  I like how in depth the explanations were when we asked questions and you did a fantastic job keeping the group on task as well as helping us manage our time. This trip taught me about the time consuming task of introducing, researching and developing, and marketing new gm products.  Thank you again for allowing us to come and spending time with us.

·         I really enjoyed coming to Bayer’s Crop Science. It was a great learning opportunity  for me as an AP Biology student. I enjoyed being able to see the technology that is used to develop GMOs. I also liked being able to see what Bayer’s Crop Science actually does. Prior to this trip, I had never heard of Bayer. I think it was cool that y’all’s company decided to reach out to a group of high school students in order to share what all you guys actually do. It was fun to be able to go through a series of real-life scenarios and have to make decisions that would actually have an impact of the economy, world of crop science, and business.

·         When I get older and get out of college, I plan to be a businesswoman. I think this was a very cool and educational experience that allowed me to see a little bit what the business world is like. Giving our pitches to an actual board of scientists was fun. I enjoyed the way that they gave feedback. They informed us of what we did right and what we did wrong. Thank you for being the leader of my group and helping us to enjoy and be informed during our time at Bayer.

·         Thank you for spending your day with us at Bayer. I certainly learned a lot about how your company functions as well as the crop science industry. It was very interesting to learn about the entire process of creating a product and putting it on the market through the simulation that we did. It was a pleasure working with you guys and the rest of our group, and it was a great surprise to win the ‘competition’ for the investment!

·         I really appreciated your patience and willingness to answer questions or go in depth about any sort of topic throughout the simulation. It really shows how passionate you are about what you do at Bayer. I wish you success in your work and have a great day!

·         Thank you so much for spending your morning with us and being helpful to our group during the exercise. Your knowledge and expertise helped my group make informed decisions on the economic and biological situations that can occur when marketing a GMO product. This experience was amazing for me thanks to the both of you, and I have a better understanding of how biology is linked more closely with business. Thank you again!

Monday, May 8, 2017

FDA to use 3 million for consumer outreach regarding agricultural biotechnology

It was announced that the FDA would get about 3 million dollars to help counter some of the mis-information around the topic of biotechnology.

Here is a quote from the Washington Post describing the allocation of $3 million dollars:  

"The deal to avert a government shutdown, which passed the Senate by a vote of 79 to 18 Thursday, allocates $3 million to “consumer outreach and education regarding agricultural biotechnology,” which includes genetic engineering of food and commodity crops. The money is to be used to tout “the environmental, nutritional, food safety, economic, and humanitarian impacts” of biotech crops and their derivative food products."

It is unclear exactly what this program will look like or when it will be rolled out, but since it has been announced there has been a lot of chatter from supporters and opposition alike.  The opposition of the outreach initiative wonder why the government is doing the teaching instead of the regulating.  

I on the other hand am a big fan of such an initiative.  I have posted many blog entries citing scientific references on the safety of GMOs.  However the anti-GMO groups have put so much mis-information out there that it is easy to get confused on what is fact and what is fiction.   While I do believe that the industry needs to do its part in education, I believe there is nothing wrong with the government educating as well.  In fact our agencies already have some great programs to educate people on all sorts of topics.  Why should we get upset about them trying to counter mis-information on GMOs?  

The Washington Post already has 292 comments on the article about the FDA outreach program.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/05/03/the-government-is-going-to-try-to-convince-you-to-like-gmo-foods/?utm_term=.8694cdfb2531#comments



Here are some educational programs by the EPA.  I do not see any major outrage at these resources the government is spending to sponsor these educational programs:  https://www.epa.gov/education






The FDA also has plenty of outreach and educational programs already out there.  Just go to their site and take a look.  Here are a just a couple:






I do not think there is any argument that these agencies should not be doing outreach.  Even the EPA  show on their site that education is what increases public awareness and knowledge as opposed to just information that provides facts and opinions.   Education is what separates the facts from the opinions.  



https://www.epa.gov/education/what-environmental-education


The other point is that the wealth of mis-information really does need to be countered.   I picked just a few comments to show there is a good reason to get the facts out there.



Let's try again with the facts:


https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/01/29/pewaaas-study-scientific-consensus-on-gmo-safety-stronger-than-for-global-warming/

Here is another:

???   I don't even know what to say to this one.  I am not sure I could make up something this good.  I surely can't find anything about GMOs killing anybody ever.   I did find one nice snopes.com article about the rumor of the 1st person dying from a GMO tomatoes which of course is FALSE.

http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/gmodeath.asp

In closing, one comment really summed it all up for me.  The question for you to answer is "Which is it?"