Science for a Better Life - GMOs and Trait Research

I was thinking the other day about my job and how much I love what I do.   Not only do I work with some amazing people, but I am working in an industry that really is trying to better the world no mater what some critics may say.  I had a friend tell me once that companies with a defined purpose statement are more sucessfull than companies without one.  I have only worked with companies with a purpose statement so I do not have both perspectives,  but I feel like working for a company with purpose makes a huge difference.  For instance our purpose at Bayer is "Science for a Better Life."  I want to be clear here that I am speaking my own personal opinions and not that of Bayer.  This is a personal blog and my personal feelings, but I really feel that we can make a difference in the world with the products and projects we work on.  I feel the drive to innovate to help feed a world whose population is ever increasing.

In my particular job of making genetically engineering crops (GMOs), it is not uncommon for people to ask me many questions or quickly share their own opinions.  Many times they are good questions.   The topic is a volatile one and sometimes those questions can be more of a personal attack.  Those conversations only encourage me even more to try everything I can to educate people on what we do.  Just as importantly I want to show that we who work for these companies care about what we do and the well being of our world.   We all share in the purpose to make a better life for people through science.

A few months ago I had the privilege to help work on a movie that is one more educational tool on what we do.  The other people in the video are all colleagues and friends who are just as passionate as me about helping our farmers and finding innovative solutions to ultimately feed people.  There are so many other people not on that video that also share that conviction.  We trust in science and know these products (including GMOs) are safe.  We feed them to our children because we see and believe in the science.  We proactively educate people everywhere we can.

So enjoy this video and share it with your friends.  It is one more step to learning about who we are.  A large company is nothing more than people and those people are always happy to answer your questions.  I know this because I work with them.  Get to know us.  Ask questions and get the facts before deciding GMOs are not safe.  At the end of the day we all want a better life for our family and kids.

What does "non-GMO" mean? - A case of cotton candy grapes

I had a neighbor give my kids a couple grapes the other day that tasted like cotton candy.  "What!!?? ,  I want one," I piped up.  Who wouldn't want to try a grape that tasted like cotton candy!   The grape looked like any other grape, but I must admit when I chomped down it did have hints of a cotton candy taste.

Our curiosity was peaked and we went to the store and bought our pack of cotton candy grapes.

First off I have to say I really like these grapes.  They were too expensive for me to buy except as more of a novelty every once in awhile, but at the end of the day they have a very unique flavor.

My commentary today is nothing against the grape or the company that sells them.  It was just as I started looking at the grape packaging I realized that my definition of genetic manipulation is probably pretty far off from the general consumer.

On the very top left of the bag was a great big "NON-GMO" sign.   My wife is the one who pointed the non-GMO label out and said "I call BS - they are cotton candy flavored!"  What that label is really saying is these grapes were made with good ole conventional breeding and thus non-GMO.  Plants were pollinated and the genes that give a cotton candy flavor were transferred to the plants that are harvested for the store.   The site even claims the same thing.

If I were to make a "GMO" cotton candy grape I would find those exact same genes and just insert them using a biotech approach.  In this case it may be faster because only the genes involved in the flavor would be inserted.  In breeding the genes that give the flavor are moved over but maybe other genes that are not good are moved over too.  So it takes many years to grow and select the best plant.  Both GMO and conventional breeding are valid methods and both have their place in food production.  The real take home is that both methods involve moving genes from one location to another.   The DNA is being manipulated whether through breeding or laboratory techniques.  As an aside even traditional breeding is starting to use sequencing and laboratory techniques to become more efficient.

As I looked at the Non-GMO designation on these "Cotton Candy" grape I had to chuckle.  My wife did have a point.  The non-GMO designation has a meaning and by that definition the grapes are "non-GMO", but at the same time that label it is a smokescreen in my opinion.   Those grapes were genetically modified no matter what a label that is really only used for marketing says.   Vast amounts of DNA were moved and incorporated into a plant to get the grapes you are eating.  Yes I know it was not in the lab.  But the crazy thing is if the lab did the manipulation less genes are being manipulated than when done in a field through breeding.   We eat food with DNA manipulation from a field everyday.  This is food which has thousands of gene differences compared to its undomesticated ancestors,  but we fear food that has only 1 or 2 genes added.  Remember those 1 or 2 genes have gone through testings on par with a new drug being released.  Lots and lots of questions must be answered from our regulatory agencies before foods with those "GMO" genes are released into our stores.   Those thousands of gene differences from traditional breeding are not tested at all.  Those changes are not even documented because it is the norm to assume they are safe.  So why the hate for 1 or 2  genes added by a biotech approach  that are studied and known to be safe?

This cartoon shows this DNA difference in a graphic form.

The irony is that a  "NON-GMO" plant was genetically modified.  The term GMO is so misleading and has become a term that is misunderstood.  Everything we eat is a product of genetic manipulation.  That cotton candy flavor does not exist without genes encoded from DNA that has been transferred to a new grape cultivar.   A "GMO" plant is also a plant that has had a DNA transfer.  The crazy part is that "GMO" plants have less DNA manipulation and every aspect of that manipulation has been tested for years.  Every base pair change or addition is cataloged.  Some may even argue that "GMO" food is safer because it has been tested more extensively.  Yet in society it is the Non-GMO label that is sought after without any real basis for why we want food with that label.  Non-GMO labeled food is fine, but the "GMO" food is just fine too.

Traditional breeding is great.  It is a staple tool in genetic manipulation of plants.  When you see that "NON-GMO" label next time just know that even though traditional breeding was used, the food really is genetically modified.